USOE Warehouse - AYP

USOE Home » Warehouse » Reports » AYP

Reports - AYP

Resources

Year

2010-11

PDF Revision Number	Date	Description
2011-05	8/1/2011	Initial release for LEA review
2011-06	8/2/2011	Only used for SIG 2011 schools
2011-09	8/5/2011	There was an error in the calculation of math on the High School AYP reports, 10th grade geometry tests were incorrectly included in the calculation. Corrected AYP reports for all high schools will be posted to the Move-It Site by Friday morning. A new SERF file reflecting the correction will also be posted as soon as possible. LEAs listed below have at least one high school whose status changed as a result of the correction: Box Elder, Canyons, Davis, Emery, Granite, Millard, Nebo, Ogden City, Park City, San Juan, Sevier, Tintic, Tooele, Washington

2009-10

PDF Revision Number	Date	Description
2010-11	09/02/2010	Fixed minor errors on District / LEA reports on page 4 regarding the poverty quantile.
2010-10	08/30/2010	Initial public release of AYP PDFs.

2008-09

PDF Revision Number	Date	Description
2009-9	08/31/2009	Modified n-size comparison for attendance improvement to use the prior year's attendance n-size.
2009-8	08/27/2009	Corrected an issue with some schools not correctly handling a small n size for the prior year.
2009-4	08/17/2009	Initial Release of AYP PDFs.

Versions - 2008

PDF Revision Number

Date

Description

2008-1

08/22/2009

Initial Release of AYP PDFs

2008-2

District Reports only.

Cosmetic display problem with Graduation Rate on 10-12 report corrected.
Charter Schools generating both 3-8 & 10-12 District AYP reports where only one was necessary corrected.
Program Improvement numbers incorrect for a few Districts corrected.

Versions - 2007

PDF Revision Number	Date	Description
2007-2	08/15/2007	Initial District release of AYP PDFs.
2007-3	08/16/2007	Corrected an error causing charter schools with only one grade range to always pass on the district report. Only affected districts received updated files.
2007-4	08/24/2007	The PDFs were displaying an incorrect attendance rate based only on Language Arts students. This was corrected to the attendance rate actually used in the calculation.
2007-5	08/29/2007	Version 4 reports were missing the Asian subgroup Language Arts information from the PDF reports. The information was used correctly in generating the result, but did not display properly. This version corrects the visual issue.